Salomé Lehtman is a project and advocacy advisor for Mercy Corps. © private

The impacts of climate change do not affect everyone equally. Low-income countries bear the brunt of a climate crisis they had little hand in creating, and women, girls, and children often suffer these impacts the most.  Unless action is taken, these injustices will continue to grow. These communities share a common need: sufficient and adequate funding to cope with, and adapt to, climate change. The New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) is a critical opportunity to secure funding to help communities build resilience to climate change.

Time for a reset on climate finance

Over 15 years ago, developed countries committed to mobilize $100 billion in climate finance every year by 2020. However, flaws in the design of the target meant that not only was it met two years late, it was also not nearly enough to address the reality of the climate crisis. Furthermore, the actual financial effort by developed countries to support climate action in developing countries is much lower than what official figures seem to suggest.

Much of the available finance is skewed towards efforts to reduce global emissions, which accounted for more than half of public climate finance in 2022. This means there is not enough funding to help people adapt to climate change or recover from its impacts. However, the Zurich Climate Resilience Alliance work shows what can be achieved when sufficient funding is allocated to adaptation efforts. In Jordan for example, we work with local authorities to garner support for flood prevention measures and policies, leading to more informed decision-making and ensuring communities become more resilient to climate change.

Moreover, a large portion of the funding is distributed as loans rather than grants. Loans currently make up more than two thirds of all international public climate finance. This is deeply unjust as it places unsustainable debt burdens on low-income countries, forcing them to prioritize debt repayments over critical climate action or investment in essential services, like infrastructure, health and education and creating a vicious circle of vulnerability. 

Fragile and conflict-affected situations (which experience high levels of institutional and social fragility and violent conflict) face even greater challenges. These areas, often deemed too risky to attract investments, receive little to no funding for climate action, despite being highly vulnerable to climate-induced disasters. Mercy Corps’ analysis shows that the 10 most fragile states received less than 1% of total climate finance flows. This directly affects communities that cannot be left behind when financing climate action.

The NCGQ represents a pivotal moment in the global response to climate change. The decision will have profound and lasting impacts on the lives of millions of vulnerable communities, making it imperative that the NCQG is just, ambitious, and results in a greater commitment from those most responsible for the climate crisis. 

A new climate finance target fit for purpose

COP29 will mark the culmination of three years of negotiations on the NCQG. The final outcome must go beyond a political compromize and represent a substantial step forward for climate action. The latest report from the Zurich Climate Resilience Alliance outlines five tests that the NCQG must pass to be fit for purpose:

  1. Those most responsible for climate change, and who are most able to pay, must do most to stop it: While all countries are affected by climate change, the responsibility to address it is not equal. Developed countries, bearing the greatest historic responsibility for climate change, must support those that bear the brunt of climate impacts (Annex II countries should provide up to 80% of any climate finance target according to the Centre for Global Development). This should lead to an equitable burden-sharing mechanism. This is a matter of climate justice.
  2. The new global climate finance target should be sufficiently ambitious – with public finance provision set at a minimum of $1 trillion per year in grants – and align with the evolving needs of developing countries 
  3. The funding should primarily come in the form of grants, not loans, empowering communities to build resilience and adapt to a changing climate without incurring unsustainable debt.
  4. The money should be new and additional to official development assistance (ODA) and result from better use of public resources. Public resources must be better allocated, holding polluters and profiteers accountable for funding climate action rather than placing the burden on vulnerable communities. This allocation of resources is a political choice.
  5. The funding should be easily accessible and supportive of gender equality and human rights. The new goal should ensure that funds are accessible to local governments and communities and that they address gender-specific vulnerabilities to climate change.

Achieving a robust climate finance goal requires bold political decisions and a commitment to climate justice. Mercy Corps urges policymakers to seize the opportunity at COP29 to agree on an ambitious NCQG.

It is not about numbers, it is about people

The new global finance goal is not just about financial commitments; it is about the lives and futures of millions of people around the world. If the NCQG lacks ambition, the world risks condemning these communities to a future of greater suffering and instability.

As the world stands at this crossroads, we must choose the path of justice and humanity. Let COP29 be the turning point where we move from crisis to resilience, ensuring that all communities have the chance to not just survive, but thrive in a world increasingly defined by climate change.


About the author

Salomé Lehtman is a project and advocacy advisor for Mercy Corps as part of the Zurich Climate Resilience Alliance. She is the lead on EU policy and advocacy on climate, with a particular focus on adaptation and loss and damage policy. She also has experience in EU biodiversity and sustainable finance policy. 


In the section Outside view, Global Responsibility gives experts the opportunity to comment and share their views on current and relevant development issues. The aim is to facilitate development policy debates, promote democratic discourse and highlight the importance of implementing the 2030 Agenda. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their articles. Global Responsibility does not necessarily share the views expressed.